彩神彩票必赚方案|彩神彩票计划

来源：彩神彩票平台2024-02-28 17:48

彩神彩票必赚方案

苏辉：履职尽责，助力中国式现代化、助推祖国统一进程******

　　【学习贯彻党的二十大】苏辉：履职尽责，助力中国式现代化、助推祖国统一进程

　　连日来，各民主党派、工商联和无党派人士高度关注、持续热议中共二十大，认真学习贯彻二十大精神。大家纷纷表示，要紧紧围绕中共二十大绘制的宏伟蓝图、确立的奋斗目标和作出的战略部署，切实履行好参政党职能，主动参与全过程人民民主实践，在以中国式现代化全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的新征程上作出新贡献。即日起，“统战新语”陆续刊发各民主党派中央主席、全国工商联主席和无党派人士代表的学习心声。

　　中共二十大是以习近平同志为核心的中共中央，在团结带领全国人民进军第二个百年奋斗目标的关键时刻召开的一次十分重要的大会。大会全面贯彻习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想，是推进中国式现代化新奋斗的指南针、深化伟大自我革命新赶考的宣言书、加强大团结大联合新局面的动员令。

　　让我们感到最振奋的是，选举产生以习近平同志为核心的新一届中共中央领导集体，领航民族复兴伟业，谱写团结奋斗新篇，充分彰显出“两个确立”的决定性意义；最深刻的是，极不寻常、极不平凡的过去五年成就、新时代十年伟大变革和“三件大事”历史性胜利，推动我国迈上全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程；最自信的是，新时代新征程中国共产党的使命任务，必将引领全国人民打开事业发展新天地。台盟完全拥护中共二十大作出的各项重大决策。

　　特别是中共二十大以发展全过程人民民主的整体视野，巩固和发展最广泛的爱国统一战线；贯彻新时代中国共产党解决台湾问题的总体方略，明确坚定反“独”促统，深化两岸融合发展等重大方针政策。

　　作为与中国共产党同心同行的参政党，中共十九届六中全会作出召开中共二十大决议后，台盟就谋划推进迎接中共二十大召开、学习贯彻中共二十大精神，教育引领全体盟员始终同中国共产党想在一起、站在一起、干在一起。

　　一是紧扣迎接盛会召开，营造热烈浓厚氛围。以开展“矢志不渝跟党走、携手奋进新时代”政治交接主题教育为引领，以建设台盟历史陈列馆为重点，献礼中共二十大。在中共二十大开幕日下午，台盟历史陈列馆开馆，表达台盟全体盟员坚定跟中国共产党同心奋进的牢固信念。我们将以盟史馆为载体，讲好台盟履职故事、两岸家国故事，彰显新型政党制度优势。

　　二是紧扣学习领会精神，巩固共同思想基础。台盟围绕学习中共二十大报告和习近平总书记在会议期间的重要讲话精神，构建“三学”机制。通过组织全盟收看收听大会直播“同步学”，开展领导班子研讨和全盟座谈交流“跟进学”，撰写发表署名文章、开展“阅·思源”读书、举办讲座培训等“持续学”，学深悟透中共二十大精神。

　　三是紧扣贯彻促进履职，提高自身建设水平。台盟对标对表中共二十大决策部署，坚持以中国共产党为师，以助力中国式现代化、助推祖国统一进程为题，深化政治交接，谋划履职尽责。特别是围绕台盟中央换届等重要工作，切实把中共二十大精神贯穿台盟工作始终，为全面建设社会主义现代化国家贡献力量。

　　苏辉(作者系台盟中央主席)

　　来源：统战新语微信公众号

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.